Immigrants from Norway vs Iroquois Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Iroquois
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Iroquois
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Iroquois Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,674,936 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,228,109 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 24.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Iroquois |
Minimum | 0.68% | 4.7% |
Maximum | 41.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 40.9% | 95.3% |
Mean | 10.8% | 22.4% |
Median | 9.1% | 16.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 25.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.18%), South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |