Immigrants from Pakistan vs Samoan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Pakistan
Samoan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Pakistan
Samoans
18.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
76.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Pakistan vs Samoan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 280,684,274 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 18.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,791,038 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 12.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Pakistan | Samoan |
Minimum | 5.1% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 55.9% | 62.7% |
Range | 50.9% | 58.7% |
Mean | 18.3% | 23.3% |
Median | 17.3% | 20.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.2% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.0% | 28.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 13.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Pakistan by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Immigrants from Israel (18.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Moldova (18.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Poland (18.5%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |