Immigrants from Pakistan vs Slovene Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 280,243,418 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,332,040 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 2.5%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Pakistan	Slovene
Minimum	3.6%	1.5%
Maximum	35.0%	60.0%
Range	31.4%	58.5%
Mean	14.6%	17.2%
Median	13.6%	13.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.8%	9.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	17.2%	19.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.3%	10.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.5%	11.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.4%	11.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Pakistan and Slovenes by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Italian (14.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Luxembourger (14.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.64%), Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are European (14.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Poland (14.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Argentina (14.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Laotian (14.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Belgium (14.5%, a difference of 0.87%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.1 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 14.2%
Italians	99.1 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 14.3%
Luxembourgers	99.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 14.3%
Estonians	98.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Romania	98.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	98.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Serbia	98.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.8 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 14.4%
Zimbabweans	98.8 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 14.4%
Poles	98.7 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 14.4%
Cambodians	98.7 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 14.4%
Scandinavians	98.7 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Europe	98.7 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Philippines	98.6 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.6 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 14.5%
Immigrants \| Belgium	98.5 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 14.5%
Laotians	98.4 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 14.5%
Immigrants \| Argentina	98.3 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Poland	98.2 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 14.6%
Europeans	98.1 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 14.6%
Slovenes	98.1 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 14.6%