Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Bolivia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Immigrants from Bolivia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Immigrants from Bolivia
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Bolivia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,374,584 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,699,026 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.104 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 0.12%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | Immigrants from Bolivia |
Minimum | 1.4% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 17.7% | 29.9% |
Range | 16.2% | 27.5% |
Mean | 9.1% | 10.6% |
Median | 9.5% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Bolivia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and Italian (11.6%, a difference of 0.77%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |