Immigrants from Serbia vs Chinese Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
Chinese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Chinese
11.1%
POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs Chinese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,733,920 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 16.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.3% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 26.9% | 26.1% |
Range | 25.6% | 22.7% |
Mean | 9.9% | 10.2% |
Median | 9.1% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 11.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Immigrants from Bulgaria (11.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Austria (11.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Philippines (11.0%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Croatia (11.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and Estonian (11.1%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Asians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Germans | 98.1 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 5.6%), Immigrants from India (9.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |