Immigrants from Singapore vs Lithuanian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Singapore
Lithuanian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Singapore
Lithuanians
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Singapore vs Lithuanian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,997,668 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 4.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 416,141,863 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 4.0%, a difference of 3.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Singapore | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 0.78% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 20.5% | 14.7% |
Range | 19.7% | 13.1% |
Mean | 4.1% | 4.6% |
Median | 3.6% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 3.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 5.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Singapore and Lithuanians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Singapore are Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.37%), Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 0.51%), Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 0.56%), Bulgarian (4.0%, a difference of 0.70%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |