Immigrants from Somalia vs Celtic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Somalia
Celtic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Somalia
Celtics
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
49.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Somalia vs Celtic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,101,870 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Somalia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,795 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 26.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Somalia | Celtic |
| Minimum | 5.5% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 56.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 50.6% | 97.8% |
| Mean | 19.1% | 15.9% |
| Median | 17.0% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.1% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.1% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Somalia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Somalia are British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (13.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Israeli (13.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
| South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |
| Venezuelans | 44.5 /100 | #181 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 44.5 /100 | #182 | Average 13.5% |