Immigrants from South Africa vs Immigrants from Turkey Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Immigrants from Turkey
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Immigrants from Turkey
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Immigrants from Turkey Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,909,353 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.647 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,589,899 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 0.62%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Immigrants from Turkey |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 30.8% | 18.7% |
Range | 29.4% | 17.0% |
Mean | 8.3% | 7.5% |
Median | 6.4% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 8.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Immigrants from Turkey by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (8.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |