Immigrants from South Africa vs Polish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Polish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Poles
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Polish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,419,478 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,648,270 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.57%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Polish |
| Minimum | 4.7% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 77.8% |
| Range | 95.3% | 72.7% |
| Mean | 31.9% | 19.6% |
| Median | 23.5% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.1% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.4% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.3% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.9% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.4% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Poles by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Chile (20.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Mongolian (20.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |