Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 393,933,079 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,979,827 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 1.8%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Southern Europe	Czechoslovakian
Minimum	8.7%	2.7%
Maximum	38.5%	54.7%
Range	29.8%	51.9%
Mean	18.4%	24.4%
Median	15.7%	20.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	12.1%	13.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	22.5%	32.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.4%	19.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.3%	13.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.1%	13.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe and Czechoslovakians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe are Albanian (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (15.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Kuwait (15.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Icelander (15.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and Portuguese (15.5%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (15.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.36%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Scottish	93.0 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 15.3%
Immigrants \| Norway	92.3 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 15.3%
Tlingit-Haida	92.2 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 15.3%
Czechoslovakians	92.1 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 15.3%
Palestinians	91.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 15.4%
Carpatho Rusyns	91.1 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 15.4%
Canadians	90.6 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Brazil	90.3 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 15.4%
Mongolians	90.2 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	90.0 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	88.7 /100 \| #132	Excellent 15.5%
Welsh	88.3 /100 \| #133	Excellent 15.5%
Peruvians	88.1 /100 \| #134	Excellent 15.5%
Portuguese	87.5 /100 \| #135	Excellent 15.5%
Icelanders	87.5 /100 \| #136	Excellent 15.5%
Immigrants \| Spain	87.1 /100 \| #137	Excellent 15.6%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	86.5 /100 \| #138	Excellent 15.6%
Albanians	86.5 /100 \| #139	Excellent 15.6%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	85.6 /100 \| #140	Excellent 15.6%
Slavs	84.5 /100 \| #141	Excellent 15.7%