Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Carpatho Rusyn Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Carpatho Rusyn
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Carpatho Rusyns
12.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Carpatho Rusyn Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,673,263 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,861,278 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.071 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Carpatho Rusyn |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 21.1% | 30.2% |
Range | 19.7% | 29.7% |
Mean | 10.3% | 11.6% |
Median | 10.3% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 14.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Carpatho Rusyns by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Estonian (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Serbia (12.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Philippines (12.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Scandinavian (12.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Cambodian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Zimbabwean (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Swiss (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Netherlands (12.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |