Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Czechoslovakian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Czechoslovakian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Czechoslovakians
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
MALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Czechoslovakian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,466,412 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.695 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,409,681 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 26.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 2.1% | 0.22% |
Maximum | 83.2% | 37.0% |
Range | 81.1% | 36.8% |
Mean | 12.7% | 12.4% |
Median | 11.6% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from England (10.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Belgian (10.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Egyptian (10.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Belgium | 96.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Irish | 96.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.3% |
English | 96.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Belgians | 95.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |