Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Ute Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Ute
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Ute
6.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Ute Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,451,122 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.308 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,601,048 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 3.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Ute |
| Minimum | 0.18% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 18.0% | 32.8% |
| Range | 17.8% | 28.6% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 11.0% |
| Median | 4.7% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Ute by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are U.S. Virgin Islander (6.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (6.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Bahamian (6.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and Nicaraguan (6.7%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Dutch West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Black/African American (6.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and Guyanese (6.5%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |