Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Argentinean Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Argentinean
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Argentineans
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Argentinean Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,789,316 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,986,445 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.261 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.90%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Argentinean |
Minimum | 2.4% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 19.2% | 24.8% |
Range | 16.7% | 24.0% |
Mean | 9.5% | 9.7% |
Median | 9.3% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Argentineans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Tlingit-Haida (11.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Sri Lankan (11.7%, a difference of 0.080%), New Zealander (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Puget Sound Salish (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |