Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scottish Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Scottish
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Scottish
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scottish Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,776,371 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 565,490,793 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.659 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 0.81%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Scottish |
| Minimum | 0.44% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 23.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 22.5% | 98.5% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 21.6% |
| Median | 8.3% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 20.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 11.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 22.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Scottish by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from South Africa (10.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Egypt (10.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Romanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Australian (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Jordanian (10.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |