Israeli vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Israeli
Immigrants from Oceania
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Israelis
Immigrants from Oceania
5.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
33.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,909,824 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,370,151 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 6.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Israeli | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 0.81% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 38.6% | 12.9% |
Range | 37.8% | 11.9% |
Mean | 7.9% | 6.0% |
Median | 5.0% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Israelis by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Albania (5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), South American Indian (5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Hungarian (5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Ugandan (5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and American (5.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Chile | 38.8 /100 | #181 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 37.7 /100 | #182 | Fair 5.3% |
Peruvians | 37.6 /100 | #183 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 35.8 /100 | #184 | Fair 5.3% |
Americans | 35.4 /100 | #185 | Fair 5.3% |
Hungarians | 34.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 33.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 5.3% |
Israelis | 33.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.3% |
South American Indians | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.3% |
Ugandans | 31.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 30.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |