Japanese vs Ghanaian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Japanese
Ghanaian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Japanese
Ghanaians
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
26.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
15.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Ghanaian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,508,626 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,278,551 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 1.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Ghanaian |
| Minimum | 11.5% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 52.6% |
| Range | 88.5% | 50.5% |
| Mean | 28.5% | 22.2% |
| Median | 23.4% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.9% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.3% | 23.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.9% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Ghanaians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Swiss (21.4%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Belgian (21.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Haitian (21.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Finnish (21.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (21.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Africa (21.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
| Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
| Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
| Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
| Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
| Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
| Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |