Kenyan vs Tongan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Kenyan
Tongan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Kenyans
Tongans
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kenyan vs Tongan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,574,201 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.577 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,697,029 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 4.7%, a difference of 0.92%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Kenyan | Tongan |
Minimum | 0.40% | 0.80% |
Maximum | 18.8% | 18.0% |
Range | 18.3% | 17.2% |
Mean | 5.1% | 5.5% |
Median | 4.4% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 6.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Kenyans and Tongans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Celtic (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Taiwanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Pakistani (4.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Bolivia (4.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (4.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Laotian (4.7%, a difference of 0.58%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Moldova | 97.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Aleuts | 97.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | France | 96.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 96.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Laotians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Romanians | 92.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 4.8% |