Kiowa vs Dutch West Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Kiowa
Dutch West Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Kiowa
Dutch West Indians
26.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Dutch West Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,984,677 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 26.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,533,400 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.733 and weighted average of 27.5%, a difference of 1.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa | Dutch West Indian |
| Minimum | 20.0% | 18.0% |
| Maximum | 69.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 49.2% | 82.0% |
| Mean | 34.9% | 42.0% |
| Median | 31.9% | 34.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.4% | 27.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.4% | 53.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.0% | 26.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 21.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 20.6% |
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Dutch West Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.52%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 0.98%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Creek (27.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Apache (27.7%, a difference of 0.91%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 0.96%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |