Laotian vs Immigrants from Serbia Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,108,732 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,954,888 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 0.12%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Laotian	Immigrants from Serbia
Minimum	0.40%	0.43%
Maximum	90.3%	45.0%
Range	89.9%	44.6%
Mean	18.2%	13.6%
Median	13.4%	12.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.1%	7.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	21.5%	16.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.4%	9.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	15.7%	9.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	15.5%	9.0%

Demographics Similar to Laotians and Immigrants from Serbia by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Philippines (14.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Zimbabwean (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Sweden (14.4%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Immigrants from Pakistan (14.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Zimbabwean (14.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Philippines (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Sweden (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Croatians	99.5 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 14.0%
Estonians	99.4 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.4 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 14.1%
Greeks	99.4 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.4 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.4 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 14.1%
Czechs	99.3 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 14.1%
Italians	99.2 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.2 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 14.2%
Laotians	99.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Philippines	99.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.0 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.0 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 14.3%
Zimbabweans	99.0 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 14.3%
Poles	98.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	98.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Belgium	98.9 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 14.4%
Scandinavians	98.8 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Israel	98.7 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 14.4%
Cambodians	98.5 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 14.5%