Liberian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Poverty
COMPARE
Liberian
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Liberians
Immigrants from Middle Africa
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
247th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Liberian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,984,513 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.449 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,471,628 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.495 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 4.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Liberian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Minimum | 0.35% | 0.57% |
Maximum | 40.1% | 16.7% |
Range | 39.8% | 16.1% |
Mean | 11.2% | 8.8% |
Median | 9.7% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 10.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Liberians and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Cherokee (10.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.77%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Nigerian (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Fijian (10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nigeria (10.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |