Lithuanian vs Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Chickasaw
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Comparison
Lithuanians
Chickasaw
10.6%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,702,438 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.541 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,762,079 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 10.0%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lithuanian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 68.1% | 40.0% |
Range | 65.8% | 38.3% |
Mean | 13.6% | 14.2% |
Median | 11.0% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 17.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 7.7% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Bhutanese (10.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Polish (10.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Menominee (10.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Slovene (10.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and Czech (10.5%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Poles | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Irish | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Swiss | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Singapore (11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (11.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Jordanian (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
Immigrants | Japan | 91.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 91.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Syrians | 91.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Jordanians | 90.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 90.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 90.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chickasaw | 90.2 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Russians | 89.9 /100 | #106 | Excellent 11.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 89.4 /100 | #107 | Excellent 11.7% |
Turks | 89.4 /100 | #108 | Excellent 11.7% |
South Africans | 89.3 /100 | #109 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 88.7 /100 | #110 | Excellent 11.7% |
Burmese | 88.7 /100 | #111 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 88.4 /100 | #112 | Excellent 11.7% |