Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Taiwan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Immigrants from Taiwan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Lithuanians
Immigrants from Taiwan
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Taiwan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 420,202,329 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,599,094 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 6.6%, a difference of 8.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Taiwan |
Minimum | 2.0% | 0.55% |
Maximum | 31.6% | 12.6% |
Range | 29.6% | 12.0% |
Mean | 8.3% | 5.6% |
Median | 6.4% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 7.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Immigrants from Taiwan by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 0.88%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 0.61%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 1.2%), Chinese (6.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 5.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |