Macedonian vs Burmese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Macedonian
Burmese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Macedonians
Burmese
11.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Burmese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,594,768 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.353 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,783,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Macedonian | Burmese |
| Minimum | 0.74% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 22.4% | 48.2% |
| Range | 21.7% | 46.5% |
| Mean | 9.2% | 11.4% |
| Median | 9.4% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Macedonians and Burmese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Poland (11.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Russian (11.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Greece (11.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (11.8%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Italian (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |