Mexican American Indian vs Kiowa Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Kiowa
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Kiowa
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
281st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Kiowa Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,454,269 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.192 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,003,088 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339 and weighted average of 6.6%, a difference of 3.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Kiowa |
Minimum | 0.88% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 21.8% | 17.1% |
Range | 20.9% | 13.7% |
Mean | 8.4% | 8.0% |
Median | 7.9% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.0% | 9.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians and Kiowa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Ute (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Dutch West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.50%), West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and Houma (6.4%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are U.S. Virgin Islander (6.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Bahamian (6.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and Nicaraguan (6.7%, a difference of 0.61%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |