Native/Alaskan vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Chickasaw
24.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,623,262 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.569 and weighted average of 24.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 21.0%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 8.2% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 79.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 71.4% | 96.7% |
Mean | 33.8% | 27.0% |
Median | 31.3% | 23.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.6% | 18.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.3% | 30.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.7% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Colville (24.1%, a difference of 0.58%), Dominican (24.2%, a difference of 0.92%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (24.3%, a difference of 1.5%), Pueblo (23.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and Apache (24.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.2% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.5% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 24.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 24.1% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 24.2% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.3% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 19.9% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.0% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.0% |