New Zealander vs Immigrants from Hungary Poverty
COMPARE
New Zealander
Immigrants from Hungary
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
New Zealanders
Immigrants from Hungary
11.7%
POVERTY
88.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Immigrants from Hungary Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,895,719 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,671,774 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.020%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | Immigrants from Hungary |
Minimum | 0.99% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 21.4% | 33.5% |
Range | 20.4% | 31.9% |
Mean | 9.7% | 9.8% |
Median | 9.1% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 10.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Immigrants from Hungary by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Puget Sound Salish (11.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Tlingit-Haida (11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Soviet Union (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Argentinean (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Puget Sound Salish (11.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Soviet Union (11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Tlingit-Haida (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Brazil (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Israel | 87.4 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.7% |
South Africans | 87.0 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.8% |
French | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.8% |
Peruvians | 85.6 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.8% |