Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Nigerian
Czechoslovakian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Nigerians
Czechoslovakians
5.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
14.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 330,785,707 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 364,959,932 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 26.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nigerian | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 1.4% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 17.3% | 21.7% |
Range | 15.9% | 20.4% |
Mean | 6.3% | 6.9% |
Median | 5.7% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Nigerians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Immigrants from Micronesia (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Syria (5.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Liberia (5.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and Iroquois (5.5%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% |
Iroquois | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.5% |
Armenians | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.5% |
Potawatomi | 12.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 5.5% |
Afghans | 11.2 /100 | #218 | Poor 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Netherlands (4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), French (4.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Austrian (4.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |