Nonimmigrants vs Immigrants from Jordan Single Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,693,652 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 23.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,238,780 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051 and weighted average of 19.3%, a difference of 22.2%.

In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Paraguayan (19.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (19.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Latvia (19.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Peru (19.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Belarus (19.3%, a difference of 0.19%).