Northern European vs Immigrants from England Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 396,909,088 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 383,466,491 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.616 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 1.7%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Northern European	Immigrants from England
Minimum	7.8%	9.7%
Maximum	62.9%	100.0%
Range	55.1%	90.3%
Mean	24.2%	28.4%
Median	19.0%	19.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	12.7%	14.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	32.2%	36.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	19.5%	21.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	15.6%	24.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	15.4%	23.7%

Demographics Similar to Northern Europeans and Immigrants from England by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Northern Europeans are Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Austrian (14.9%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Chilean (15.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ukraine (15.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.14%), British (15.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Finns	97.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 14.8%
Immigrants \| Canada	97.1 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 14.8%
Jordanians	97.1 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 14.8%
Northern Europeans	97.0 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 14.8%
Immigrants \| Belarus	97.0 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 14.8%
Austrians	96.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| North America	96.6 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	96.3 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 14.9%
Germans	96.3 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| France	96.2 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Latvia	96.1 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 14.9%
Basques	95.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Egypt	95.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 15.0%
Paraguayans	95.7 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| South Africa	95.6 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 15.0%
British	95.6 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 15.0%
Romanians	95.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| England	95.1 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 15.1%
Chileans	95.1 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	95.0 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 15.1%