Norwegian vs Brazilian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Norwegian
Brazilian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Norwegians
Brazilians
13.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
81.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Brazilian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,210,620 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,230,692 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 19.6%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Brazilian |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 70.0% | 41.6% |
Range | 68.4% | 39.6% |
Mean | 14.7% | 16.2% |
Median | 12.6% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 19.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 7.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Maltese (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (13.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Ireland (13.1%, a difference of 0.51%), Bulgarian (13.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and Bolivian (13.3%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Slovak (15.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Jordan (15.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Venezuelan (15.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Puget Sound Salish (15.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and New Zealander (15.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Slavs | 84.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 84.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 83.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 83.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.7% |
Samoans | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.7% |
New Zealanders | 82.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Venezuelans | 82.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Brazilians | 81.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.8% |
Slovaks | 80.3 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.2 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.8 /100 | #151 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |