Norwegian vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Norwegian
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Norwegians
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
8.7%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
21.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 529,132,096 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,103,191 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 29.6%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
Minimum | 2.6% | 3.2% |
Maximum | 75.0% | 35.9% |
Range | 72.4% | 32.6% |
Mean | 11.7% | 11.8% |
Median | 8.7% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.7% | 12.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 5.3% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Swedish (8.7%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from India (8.8%, a difference of 0.96%), Danish (8.8%, a difference of 1.4%), German (9.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and Czech (9.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.0% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Poles | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Israel (11.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Alsatian (11.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Albanian (11.2%, a difference of 0.38%), Bangladeshi (11.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Brazil (11.3%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants | Uganda | 32.2 /100 | #191 | Fair 11.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 30.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 11.1% |
Taiwanese | 29.2 /100 | #193 | Fair 11.2% |
Chileans | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 11.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 26.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 11.2% |
Bangladeshis | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 11.2% |
Albanians | 24.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 11.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 21.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 11.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 20.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 11.3% |
Alsatians | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 11.3% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.3% |
Costa Ricans | 17.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 11.3% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 16.9 /100 | #203 | Poor 11.3% |
Israelis | 16.5 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.3% |
Brazilians | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.3% |