Norwegian vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Immigrants from Costa Rica
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
63.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,441,916 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,952,607 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 20.9%, a difference of 0.10%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Norwegian | Immigrants from Costa Rica |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 7.4% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 52.6% |
| Range | 46.4% | 45.2% |
| Mean | 24.8% | 22.0% |
| Median | 23.2% | 20.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.1% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.1% | 24.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Immigrants from Costa Rica by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |