Norwegian vs Moroccan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
Moroccan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Moroccans
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Moroccan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,481,223 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,724,575 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 24.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Norwegian | Moroccan |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 55.6% | 51.5% |
| Range | 54.6% | 47.1% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 16.6% |
| Median | 11.1% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 10.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Malaysian (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |