Ottawa vs Bangladeshi Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ottawa
Bangladeshi
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Ottawa
Bangladeshis
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ottawa vs Bangladeshi Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,944,189 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.321 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,334,691 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 4.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ottawa | Bangladeshi |
Minimum | 3.2% | 3.9% |
Maximum | 28.7% | 28.8% |
Range | 25.5% | 24.9% |
Mean | 11.6% | 13.8% |
Median | 12.1% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ottawa and Bangladeshis by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Belizean (13.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and Chickasaw (13.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |