Ottawa vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,800,712 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,953,129 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 2.9%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Ottawa	Immigrants from Bangladesh
Minimum	1.2%	5.0%
Maximum	38.6%	49.6%
Range	37.3%	44.6%
Mean	19.7%	21.0%
Median	19.9%	17.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	13.8%	13.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	23.7%	26.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.9%	12.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.9%	10.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.8%	10.7%

Demographics Similar to Ottawa and Immigrants from Bangladesh by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Inupiat (19.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish American (19.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Africa (19.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Mexican American Indian (19.3%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Liberia (19.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (19.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Spanish American Indian (19.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (19.7%, a difference of 0.46%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.2 /100 \| #254	Tragic 19.2%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.2%
Inupiat	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.2%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.2%
Spanish Americans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.2%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.4%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.4%
Vietnamese	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.4%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.4%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.5%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.5%
Cherokee	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.5%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.7%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Liberia	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	0.1 /100 \| #274	Tragic 19.9%