Pakistani vs Jordanian Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Pakistani
Jordanian
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Pakistanis
Jordanians
15.7%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
74.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Jordanian Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,533,839 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,384,155 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.413 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 2.4%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pakistani | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 56.5% |
| Range | 96.7% | 51.9% |
| Mean | 34.2% | 22.1% |
| Median | 25.0% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.1% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.1% | 28.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.0% | 14.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.4% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.1% | 13.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Father Poverty
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Native Hawaiian (15.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (15.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Australia (15.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Australian (15.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and South American Indian (15.7%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Fijians | 96.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Chileans | 96.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| South American Indians | 96.2 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Australians | 96.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 96.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Pakistanis | 95.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Turks | 95.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 95.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Bulgarians | 94.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.7 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Danes | 94.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Argentineans | 94.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are South African (16.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (16.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (16.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Israel (16.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Nigerian (16.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Immigrants | Central America | 83.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 81.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 80.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 78.3 /100 | #146 | Good 16.1% |
| Colombians | 77.1 /100 | #147 | Good 16.1% |
| Nigerians | 76.8 /100 | #148 | Good 16.1% |
| South Africans | 75.1 /100 | #149 | Good 16.1% |
| Jordanians | 74.2 /100 | #150 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 72.1 /100 | #152 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 72.0 /100 | #153 | Good 16.1% |
| Mexicans | 70.1 /100 | #154 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 67.8 /100 | #155 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.0 /100 | #156 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 62.8 /100 | #157 | Good 16.2% |