Palestinian vs Belgian Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Belgian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Belgians
11.6%
POVERTY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Belgian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,388,270 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,864,059 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Belgians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Palestinian | Belgian |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 25.3% | 23.4% |
| Range | 25.0% | 21.2% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 9.4% |
| Median | 10.2% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Belgians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Belgians are Czechoslovakian (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Denmark (11.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Finnish (11.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and British (11.4%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |