Peruvian vs Hungarian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Peruvian
Hungarian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Peruvians
Hungarians
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
85.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
70.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Peruvian vs Hungarian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,941,638 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,692,155 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 2.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Peruvian | Hungarian |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 40.9% | 73.9% |
| Range | 40.7% | 72.6% |
| Mean | 14.1% | 18.8% |
| Median | 12.5% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 26.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 16.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Peruvians and Hungarians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Peruvians are French (12.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |