Pima vs Burmese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Pima
Burmese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Pima
Burmese
28.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Burmese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,453,639 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 28.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,212,415 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 116.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Burmese |
| Minimum | 11.0% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 43.4% |
| Range | 89.0% | 42.2% |
| Mean | 41.2% | 10.3% |
| Median | 34.9% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.2% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 57.9% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 36.7% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.6% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.1% | 6.8% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Okinawan (13.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (13.1%, a difference of 0.93%), Bulgarian (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from Korea (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Ireland (12.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |