Polish vs Immigrants from South America Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Polish
Immigrants from South America
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Poles
Immigrants from South America
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Immigrants from South America Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,648,270 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,439,671 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.23%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Immigrants from South America |
| Minimum | 5.1% | 9.4% |
| Maximum | 77.8% | 30.0% |
| Range | 72.7% | 20.6% |
| Mean | 19.6% | 19.1% |
| Median | 18.3% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.4% | 21.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Immigrants from South America by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.030%), South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |