Puerto Rican vs South African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Puerto Rican
South African
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Puerto Ricans
South Africans
32.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
88.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puerto Rican vs South African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,321,641 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.718 and weighted average of 32.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,602,695 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.734 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 110.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Puerto Rican | South African |
Minimum | 11.1% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 60.5% |
Range | 88.9% | 55.9% |
Mean | 39.4% | 17.6% |
Median | 31.2% | 14.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.1% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.3% | 17.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 29.2% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.8% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.7% | 12.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Puerto Ricans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Puerto Ricans are Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 3.4%), Lumbee (30.7%, a difference of 6.4%), Navajo (30.5%, a difference of 7.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and Pima (28.2%, a difference of 15.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Native Hawaiian (15.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Czechoslovakian (15.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Vietnam (15.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Armenian (15.5%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |