Romanian vs Immigrants from Denmark Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 369,938,935 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,139,155 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.561 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 1.2%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Romanian	Immigrants from Denmark
Minimum	4.0%	4.6%
Maximum	70.0%	100.0%
Range	66.0%	95.4%
Mean	23.0%	29.2%
Median	16.3%	15.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.4%	10.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	28.8%	24.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	17.5%	14.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	19.3%	29.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	19.0%	29.1%

Demographics Similar to Romanians and Immigrants from Denmark by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Chilean (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), British (15.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from South Africa (15.0%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Immigrants from North Macedonia (15.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Belgian (15.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Sri Lankan (15.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Paraguayans	95.7 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| South Africa	95.6 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 15.0%
British	95.6 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 15.0%
Romanians	95.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| England	95.1 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 15.1%
Chileans	95.1 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	95.0 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Brazil	94.9 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 15.1%
Serbians	94.8 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Croatia	94.6 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 15.1%
Palestinians	94.5 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	94.3 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 15.1%
Dutch	94.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 15.1%
Sri Lankans	94.0 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 15.2%
Belgians	93.9 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Denmark	93.3 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	93.1 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	92.7 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 15.3%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.5 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 15.3%
Pakistanis	92.3 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 15.3%