Samoan vs Brazilian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Samoan
Brazilian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Samoans
Brazilians
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
89.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Brazilian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,807,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 318,856,218 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 1.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Samoan | Brazilian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 64.0% | 56.7% |
Range | 62.3% | 54.0% |
Mean | 16.5% | 16.6% |
Median | 14.8% | 14.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.5% | 20.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Brazilians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Slavic (15.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Welsh (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Icelander (15.7%, a difference of 0.38%), Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Puget Sound Salish (15.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Czechoslovakian (15.5%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |