Scottish vs Portuguese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Scottish
Portuguese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Scottish
Portuguese
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
90.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs Portuguese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 554,294,508 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.746 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,338,613 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 0.73%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scottish | Portuguese |
Minimum | 5.6% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 43.1% |
Range | 94.4% | 42.1% |
Mean | 37.1% | 16.1% |
Median | 21.1% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.9% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.8% | 19.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 38.9% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 31.5% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 31.2% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish and Portuguese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are South African (15.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Norway (15.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Pakistani (15.0%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from Western Europe (15.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Czechoslovakian (15.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Irish | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Belgians | 93.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Sri Lankans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 93.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 90.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 89.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 15.1% |
Mongolians | 89.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 15.2% |
Armenians | 89.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 15.2% |
Canadians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.2% |