Serbian vs Carpatho Rusyn Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Serbian
Carpatho Rusyn
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Serbians
Carpatho Rusyns
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Carpatho Rusyn Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,350,230 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,553,439 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.96%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Serbian | Carpatho Rusyn |
| Minimum | 5.0% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 56.7% | 77.8% |
| Range | 51.7% | 74.7% |
| Mean | 21.7% | 22.7% |
| Median | 20.7% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.4% | 26.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Serbians and Carpatho Rusyns by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Mongolian (20.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Chile (20.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Immigrants from Netherlands (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Colombia (20.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |