Sioux vs Chilean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Sioux
Chilean
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Sioux
Chileans
25.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sioux vs Chilean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,838,275 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.644 and weighted average of 25.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,944,579 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 69.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sioux | Chilean |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 48.3% |
| Range | 98.2% | 43.2% |
| Mean | 45.0% | 16.2% |
| Median | 35.9% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.5% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 64.6% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 45.1% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.8% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.7% | 9.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Sioux by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Yup'ik (25.8%, a difference of 0.93%), Pueblo (25.2%, a difference of 1.5%), Menominee (25.0%, a difference of 2.2%), Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and Crow (26.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ukraine (15.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |