Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
COMPARE
Slavic
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Slavs
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
11.5%
POVERTY
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,786,783 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.645 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,789,316 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.47%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 0.14% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 44.1% | 19.2% |
| Range | 43.9% | 16.7% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 9.5% |
| Median | 10.1% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Scottish (11.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.5%, a difference of 0.42%), and Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |