Slavic vs Welsh Male Poverty
COMPARE
Slavic
Welsh
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Slavs
Welsh
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Welsh Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,742,219 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 527,618,308 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.626 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 0.010%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic | Welsh |
Minimum | 0.066% | 4.4% |
Maximum | 41.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 41.2% | 95.6% |
Mean | 11.9% | 17.1% |
Median | 9.3% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 17.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 17.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 17.3% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Welsh by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Laotian (10.5%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Laotian (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 89.8 /100 | #111 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |
Palestinians | 89.1 /100 | #113 | Excellent 10.6% |