Somali vs Ethiopian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Somali
Ethiopian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Somalis
Ethiopians
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
68.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Somali vs Ethiopian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,100,573 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Somalis and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.790 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,211,608 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 13.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Somali | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 31.7% | 22.9% |
| Range | 30.7% | 21.8% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 6.0% |
| Median | 5.2% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Somalis by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Chickasaw (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Ghanaians | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Pennsylvania German (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
| Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
| Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
| Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |